In Exile, At Home - צירופים חדשים

In Exile, At Home

Haim Watzman

4 October 2020
Reading time: 9 min read

You, said God, will be a living symbol of the promise of redemption. Your people, living in exile, despair of redemption. I want them to look beyond their sorrow and loss toward My promise that I will return them to their land.

A sukkah, too, is a form of exile. You’re forced to leave your house and live in a rickety structure exposed to the elements. Yet in the sukkah we rejoice.

A story, inspired by Rav Shagar's teachings, about whether one can both mourn and rejoice in the Sukkah. It is reprinted with the author's permission from his book of short fiction, Necessary Stories, a collection of some of the stories he has published monthly over the last twelve years.


After Sukkah 25b

The stranger is dressed in a threadbare sports jacket, which looks like it might have come from a second-hand shop, and a dusty black kipah. He strokes his short beard as he walks up and down the rows of graves at the Mt. Herzl military cemetery, stopping for a few beats at each to read the headstone. In the row in front of me he has to detour around t-shirt and shorts-clad twenty-somethings in a Birthright group, listening to a guide I can’t hear. Finally he arrives at the last full row, where I am sitting. The lawn in front of the row waits for new tragedies.

He nods at me, hugging himself. I nod back. After a moment he speaks.

“It’s cold here in Jerusalem.”

I shrug. “Here we’re used to the seasons starting to change the week before Rosh Hashanah. You must be from someplace warmer. Tel Aviv?”

“Tiberias. Also Sura.”

I look at him quizzically. “You mean the one just west of the Euphrates?”

“That’s where I studied.” He holds out his hand. “Abba bar Zabda.”

I shake it. “Haim,” I say. “I can’t place the name, though. I mean, I’ve studied a bit but I’m hardly a scholar.”

“Yes.” He sighs. “My wife wasn’t pleased at all when she saw the final redaction. ‘You’re never home,’ she griped, ‘all day at the house of study, and then when they finally publish, they barely quote you.’ I think it was because I have a knack for saying the wrong thing.”

“Oh, wait a minute. Now I remember. You’re the one with the vermin in the mikveh, the ritual purifying bath.”

He smiles and quotes himself: “As long as a man holds vermin in his hand, he may bathe in all the waters of creation, but he will never be pure.”

“That’s a good one,” I tell him. “I use it all the time.”

“I appreciate that.” He points at a vacant plastic stool. “May I?”

I motion for him to sit.

He nods at the grave. “Your son?”

A cool breeze blows through the cypresses, perfumed by the rosemary growing on the headstone. A pinwheel left by my oldest daughter twirls.

I nod. Then, after a minute: “I had some time between meetings, so I stopped by.”

“That’s good,” he says. “It is a tradition to visit the graves of loved ones during the month of Elul.”

“Yes, to steel yourself for another holiday without them,” I reply.

“What’s the hardest part of the holidays?”

I consider. “Maybe building the sukkah. He used to help me with that.”

“Sukkot,” he observes, “is the only holiday on which the Torah explicitly commands us to be happy.”

“I do my best. But it’s not the same.”

“I might quote Ezekiel.” He looks at me. “The prophet, I mean.”


“So he also lived by the river of Babylon. Centuries before I went to study there in Rav’s academy. Ezekiel had a wife he loved dearly, and the Holy One, Blessed Be He, told him: ‘Son of Man, behold, I am about to take the light of your eyes suddenly. But do not mourn or weep.’ Put on your best clothes, spruce up your beard, and go about your business as if nothing happened. You, said God, will be a living symbol of the promise of redemption. Your people, living in exile, despair of redemption. I want them to look beyond their sorrow and loss toward My promise that I will return them to their land. By going on with your life normally despite the blow you have suffered, you will show them that they, too, must live as best they can, looking to the future and not to the past.”

I grimace. “Perhaps a prophet needs to be a public symbol. But I am not going to not mourn my son.”

“Now you may wonder what this has to do with building a sukkah,” Abba Bar Zabda says. He looks up and notices a clutch of Birthrighters listening in. “That’s the holiday that begins on the fifteenth day of Tishrei, five days after Yom Kippur,” he explains to them. “According to the Torah, Jews are commanded to leave their homes on this day and spend seven days living in a ramshackle hut, like the ones our ancestors lived in during their forty-year sojourn in the wilderness.”

The American kids smile politely and whisper among themselves.

“Right, right,” I say. “Get to the point.”

“Now we might ask,” he continues, clasping his hands together in his lap, “whether this law is incumbent on everybody, or whether in some cases one might be exempt. For example, is a mourner required to spend seven days in a sukkah if the holiday coincides with his seven days of mourning? And must a bridegroom spend seven days in a sukkah if it coincides with his seven days of rejoicing with his bride following his wedding?”

“You have a thing about sevens?” asks a blond Birthrighter with a Texas accent.

“Not me. The Creator.” Abba Bar Zabda thinks a moment. “That’s a good question, though. Why seven? Why not eight, or six? Is it just random, or is there a reason?”

The boy looks around at his companions and laughs. “I didn’t mean for you to take it so seriously!”

“You mean,” I suggest, “that a mourner is too wrapped up in his sorrow to rejoice in the sukkah.”

“Right. Now, my teacher, Rav, who was the strict type, said that mourners must observe all the precepts in the Torah except for putting on tefillin.” The rabbi looks up at the young people. “These things we strap onto our arms and heads when we pray. But then he also said that a person who suffers in the sukkah—I mean, if it’s raining, or cold, or there’s a bad smell—can eat and sleep in his home. What are we to make of this contradiction?”

“I guess if it’s raining you can’t do much about it,” the Texan suggests.

“Very good,” says bar Zabda.

“But that assumes a mourner is capable, by an act of will, of not suffering!” I object.

“Rav said that the mourner must compose his mind,” the Tiberian says. “I’m not saying that I agree with him, I’m just reporting what he said. Now, what about the case of a bridegroom? He has an obligation to rejoice, so why shouldn’t he do so in the sukkah?”

“Depends how big the sukkah is,” says the Texan. “How big can it be? Can you fit a whole wedding banquet in?”

“Maybe the party isn’t what was worrying Rav,” I suggest.

“Quite possibly,” agrees bar Zabda. “Certainly other scholars thought so. Abaye, for example, thought it was an issue of privacy, whereas Rabbah was worried about the bridegroom’s discomfort.”

“Privacy? At a wedding?” asks the Texan.

“At a traditional Jewish wedding,” the Tiberian explains patiently, “the groom and bride retire, immediately following the ceremony, to a private room. I realize this may seem quaint today, but in my day this would be the first time they were ever alone together. And the expectation is that they would—and should—take advantage of the opportunity to consummate their love.”

The Texan guffaws. “While everyone else is partying?”

“Abaye was concerned that the groom might need to step outside,” bar Zabda expounds. “You know, he’s nervous and his bladder might act up. And a sukkah is open and often built on a street or in a courtyard. Some other man could slip inside and compromise the bride.”

“Not if she doesn’t want to be compromised,” says the Texan.

“The appearance of impropriety is no less problematic than impropriety itself,” bar Zabda reminds him.

I consider. “Rabbah,” I say, “must have been concerned that the nervous bridegroom might have trouble performing if he was worried that someone could walk in on them any time. Odd, however, that he doesn’t consider how the bride might be feeling.”

Bar Zabda shrugs. “I admit, back in the third century, we all had trouble seeing things from a woman’s point of view. But certainly the bride would not find the sukkah a congenial place to be alone ?with her husband.”

“So what’s the conclusion?” I ask. The other Birthrighters have drifted off by now, but the Texan is still standing by us, listening.

“That the problem of privacy is not sufficient to cancel the obligation for the groom to observe the precept of sitting in the sukkah, but the problem of discomfort is.”

“So, in short,” I say, “a mourner is expected to collect himself and rejoice in the sukkah, while a bridegroom, who is rejoicing anyway, is given a break. Sounds counterintuitive to me.”

“All mixed up,” the Texan echoes.

“Let’s go back to God’s commandment to Ezekiel,” bar Zabda suggests. “There, mourning is equated with exile. Ezekiel is commanded not to mourn his wife’s death publicly, not to observe the rituals that make him look to others like a mourner. This is meant to be an example to the Jews in Babylonia, who are to live their lives and go about their business as if they had not been forcibly deported from their homeland.”

I consider a minute. “A sukkah, too, is a form of exile. You’re forced to leave your house and live in a rickety structure exposed to the elements.”

“Yet in the sukkah we rejoice,” bar Zabda says, encouraging me. He looks up at the Texan. “Maybe you can take that a little further?”

The boy ponders. “I’m not sure, but maybe—the bridegroom is moving in the opposite direction, leaving the exile of being alone in the world? He’s actually going into his permanent home?”

“Not that I always understand the record of my respected colleagues’ discussions,” says bar Zabda. “The Talmud was not edited according to modern standards. But I think you are getting at something.”

“A bride and groom do not need to be commanded to rejoice,” I propose. “A mourner needs the commandment. Otherwise he will stay forever in exile and never be open to redemption.”

The Texan looks around for his friends. “Sorry, I gotta go.”

Bar Zabda holds up his hand, his thumb touching the tip of his forefinger. “We’re almost done. They’ll wait for you.”

I glance at my son’s grave. “It’s not going to be easy. Isn’t rejoicing when you’ve lost a child like dipping in a mikveh with vermin in your hand? You can never get clean?”

“I would say that, in this case, you need to hold fast and immerse yourself anyway,” bar Zabda says.

“Wow,” the Texan says. Bar Zabda nods at him, and goes off to seek his group. But he looks back once, then twice, on his way.

We listen again to the breeze.

“Ok, I’ll do my best.”

“Glad I could be of help.” bar Zabda gets up. “I should get going or I will miss my bus home. Have a good year, the best it can be.”


Write a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Comments

More articles on the subject

The Cry of the Downtrodden

Hillel Mansfield •

35 min read

a thorough examonation of the biblical cry, in order to understand the emotional and existential side of poverty.

You Can Go Home Again

Zachary Truboff •

50 min read

On the centrality of Baitiut in the thought of Rav Shagar, and our ability to feel at home with Judaism.

Sukkot: Dwelling In the Shade of Faith

Zachary Truboff •

7 min read

This essay explores Rav Shagar's experience during the Yom Kippur War and how it contributed to his understanding of emunah. To dwell in the sukkah is to experience not God's light but rather God's shade, and it is this model of faith we must ultimately seek to cultivate.